Listen to the following audio:

Erroneous and Problematic Beliefs About Hypnosis

This module provides the knowledge and tools necessary for practitioners to identify and address misconceptions about hypnosis, ensuring safe and effective practice.

It focuses on common misconceptions and problematic beliefs about hypnosis that persist in various aspects of society, including religious views, fears about coercion and mind control, and associations with cults. By addressing these misunderstandings, practitioners can better educate their clients and promote the ethical use of hypnotherapy.

Section 1: Religious Misconceptions About Hypnosis

1.1 Historical Religious Opposition

• Hypnosis as a Gateway to the Occult: In many religious traditions, particularly in conservative branches of Christianity, hypnosis has historically been viewed as a form of spiritual or demonic possession. Some religious groups believe that hypnosis opens individuals to malevolent spiritual influences, equating it with occult practices such as witchcraft or sorcery.
  • Medieval Christian Views: In the Middle Ages, altered states of consciousness were often seen as dangerous or sinful. Trance states, such as those induced by hypnosis, could be misinterpreted as spiritual possession or heresy.
• Islamic Beliefs: Certain Islamic perspectives historically regarded hypnosis with suspicion, believing that surrendering control of the mind could lead individuals away from divine guidance or make them vulnerable to sinful influences. However, in more recent times, Islamic scholars have reexamined hypnosis, and some now accept it as a legitimate therapeutic tool, provided it is used ethically and with the intention of healing.

1.2 Modern Religious Concerns

• Hypnosis and Free Will: Many religious objections center around the belief that hypnosis involves surrendering free will, which goes against fundamental religious teachings. For instance, conservative Christian groups have expressed concern that hypnosis leads to a loss of self-control, which could compromise moral or spiritual integrity.
  • Catholic Church’s Position: While the Catholic Church has been cautious about hypnosis, Pope Pius XII in the 1950s acknowledged that it could be used for medical purposes if done ethically. Today, some religious institutions accept hypnosis if it aligns with spiritual and moral principles.

1.3 Clarifying the Reality

• Maintaining Free Will: In contrast to these beliefs, modern clinical hypnotherapy emphasizes that individuals retain their free will and control throughout the hypnotic process. They cannot be made to do anything against their moral or ethical values. Hypnosis is a voluntary, collaborative process in which the client has full agency.
• Hypnosis as a Medical Tool: Highlighting hypnosis as a scientifically backed therapeutic technique helps challenge religious misconceptions. Practitioners should focus on explaining hypnosis as a tool for mental health, wellness, and healing, rather than a spiritual or supernatural practice.

Section 2: Hypnosis and Coercion: Myths of Mind Control

2.1 Hypnosis and Stage Performances

• Misrepresentation in Stage Hypnosis: One of the most widespread beliefs about hypnosis is that it involves mind control, where individuals lose autonomy and are made to act against their will. This misconception is perpetuated by stage hypnosis, where performers seem to control the behavior of participants.
  • Participants in stage hypnosis shows often appear to be under the complete influence of the hypnotist, performing embarrassing or absurd actions. This leads to the belief that hypnosis can be used to manipulate or control others, even in dangerous or inappropriate ways.

2.2 Fear of Hypnotic Coercion

• Criminal Use of Hypnosis: Some people fear that hypnosis can be used to coerce individuals into criminal acts, such as theft, violence, or exploitation. Stories of "hypnotic crime" occasionally surface in the media, feeding into the idea that hypnosis is a tool for coercion or brainwashing.
  • While these stories are sensationalized, no credible scientific evidence supports the idea that hypnosis can force someone to commit an act against their ethical will.

2.3 Scientific Reality

• Hypnosis Cannot Override Personal Ethics: Numerous studies and ethical guidelines confirm that hypnosis cannot make someone act against their deeply held values or moral beliefs. While hypnosis can enhance suggestibility, it cannot erase personal autonomy. People in a hypnotic state are aware of what is happening and can reject suggestions that feel uncomfortable or wrong.
  • Voluntary Process: Hypnosis requires the subject's willingness to participate. It is not possible to hypnotize an unwilling person or force someone to reveal secrets or behave immorally under hypnosis.

2.4 Ethical Safeguards in Clinical Practice

• Informed Consent: Ethical hypnotherapy requires informed consent from clients, ensuring they fully understand the process and their ability to stop or resist suggestions at any time. Practitioners must clearly communicate that hypnosis is a therapeutic collaboration, not a tool of control or coercion.

Section 3: Hypnosis and Cults: Mind Control and Indoctrination Myths

3.1 Historical Association with Cults

• Brainwashing and Hypnosis: Hypnosis has often been linked with cults and brainwashing techniques, especially in popular culture. Some fear that cult leaders use hypnosis to manipulate followers into blind obedience, making them vulnerable to psychological manipulation and exploitation.
  • This association stems from reports of cults using hypnotic-like techniques such as repetition, trance-inducing rituals, and suggestion to alter followers’ beliefs and behaviors.

3.2 Distinguishing Hypnosis from Cult Indoctrination

• Hypnotic Techniques vs. Cult Tactics: While cults may use tactics that resemble hypnosis (e.g., repetitive chanting or meditative states), these techniques rely more on social manipulation, peer pressure, and isolation rather than genuine therapeutic hypnosis.
  • Cult indoctrination involves coercion and the removal of personal autonomy over time, whereas ethical hypnosis is a brief, voluntary, and client-centered experience.

3.3 Popular Myths About Hypnosis and Brainwashing

• Cold War and Brainwashing Myths: During the Cold War era, films and literature often portrayed hypnosis as a brainwashing tool used by hostile governments or cults to create "Manchurian Candidates"—individuals programmed to carry out dangerous tasks without their knowledge. These fictional portrayals have left a lasting impact on public perceptions.
  • False Representations: Modern hypnosis is not a tool for brainwashing or mind control, as depicted in these scenarios. Clinical hypnosis involves conscious cooperation between the therapist and client, with no power to implant beliefs or commands without consent.

Section 4: Erroneous Beliefs About Hypnosis and Control

4.1 Fear of Permanent Trance or Loss of Control

• Hypnotized Forever?: Another common fear is the idea that someone could become "stuck" in hypnosis and remain in a trance indefinitely. This misconception is often fueled by dramatic portrayals in films and television, where individuals fall into a deep trance and cannot wake up.
  • Reality: It is impossible for someone to remain stuck in a hypnotic state. Hypnosis is a natural state of focused attention and relaxation, and people naturally emerge from it either when they choose to or if left alone for a period of time. If a hypnotist stopped guiding a person, they would either return to a normal waking state or fall asleep.

4.2 Hypnosis as Complete Loss of Consciousness

• Myth of Unconsciousness: Some people mistakenly believe that hypnosis involves total unconsciousness or amnesia, where the subject has no awareness of what is happening and no memory afterward. This belief contributes to the fear that hypnosis could be used to manipulate individuals without their knowledge.
  • Scientific Understanding: In reality, most people are fully aware during hypnosis and retain memory of the session. While some experience a state of deep relaxation or heightened focus, they remain conscious of their surroundings and the therapist’s words. Only in rare cases (and usually with specific therapeutic intent) might amnesia occur.

4.3 False Memories and Hypnosis

• **Concerns Over Memory Manipulation**: Another misconception is that hypnosis can be used to implant false memories or alter a person’s past recollections. This fear is especially common in discussions about regression therapy, where hypnosis is used to explore past experiences. Critics worry that hypnotists could unintentionally create false memories, leading individuals to believe events occurred that never did.
• Scientific Caution: While hypnosis can enhance memory recall, it also makes individuals more susceptible to suggestion. In legal and therapeutic contexts, it is essential that practitioners avoid leading questions or suggestions that could distort memory. Modern training emphasizes ethical standards to prevent the creation of false memories.

Section 5: Debunking Problematic Beliefs Through Education

5.1 Educating Clients About Hypnosis

• Dispelling Myths: One of the most important roles of a hypnotherapist is to provide clear, evidence-based explanations of hypnosis to clients. This includes debunking myths about loss of control, mind manipulation, and coercion. Clients should understand that hypnosis is a natural, voluntary state where they remain in control at all times.
• Explaining Hypnotic Mechanisms: By explaining the scientific mechanisms of hypnosis—such as its impact on focused attention, relaxation, and suggestibility—therapists can demystify the process and reduce fear. Emphasizing that hypnosis is not a form of mind control but a collaborative therapeutic technique can build trust with clients.

5.2 Addressing Religious and Cultural Concerns

• Respecting Religious Beliefs: When working with clients who have religious concerns about hypnosis, practitioners should respect their beliefs and offer reassurance. By framing hypnosis as a medical or psychological tool rather than a spiritual or mystical practice, hypnotherapists can often overcome religious objections.
  • Cultural Sensitivity: Practitioners should also be aware of cultural beliefs about hypnosis, which may vary across different communities. Approaching hypnosis with cultural sensitivity and open communication can foster a more inclusive and accepting environment.

5.3 Ethical Practice as the Key to Overcoming Mistrust

• Ethical Standards in Hypnotherapy: Following clear ethical guidelines is critical to maintaining public trust in hypnosis. This includes obtaining informed consent, avoiding coercive techniques, and ensuring that clients understand their rights throughout the process.
  • Ongoing Education: Continuing education for hypnotherapists ensures that they stay informed about current research and best practices, helping to combat misconceptions and provide effective, safe therapy.

Conclusion: Overcoming Erroneous Beliefs About Hypnosis

Erroneous and problematic beliefs about hypnosis—whether related to religion, coercion, or control—have deep historical roots and continue to influence public perceptions. By understanding these misconceptions and addressing them through education, ethical practice, and clear communication, hypnotherapists can promote a more accurate and positive understanding of hypnosis as a legitimate therapeutic tool.

Key Takeaways:

• Misconceptions about hypnosis often stem from religious views, fears of mind control, and associations with cults or manipulation.
• Hypnosis cannot force individuals to act against their will or moral beliefs; it is a collaborative process where clients retain control.
• Ethical practice, including informed consent and respect for cultural and religious beliefs, is essential to countering these myths and promoting trust in hypnotherapy.

Stage Hypnosis - why mention it at all?

It is important to reduce any misconceptions people may have about the difference between clinical hypnosis and stage hypnosis.

For some people, the fears of hypnosis based on what they may have seen in a stage show. Their fears often relate to the idea of losing control, or being influenced inappropriately. If this question comes up, the practitioner will need to explain that there are many different events going on in a stage show, be able to differentiate between that and what goes on in a clinical hypnosis session and what patients believe they have seen on stage.

There are a number of components to a stage hypnosis show. The first of these is expectation. When people go to a stage show they already know what to expect of the event and will therefore already be predicting what they going to experience. The next process is peer pressure. It's very rare for people to go alone to a stage show. They usually go in groups and within each group there will be one or two individuals were more exhibitionist by nature and the rest of the group will encourage them to get up on stage. Frequently, people will drink alcohol before arriving at the stage show or while they are there. This will encourage the potential participants even further, as their inhibitions are lowered.

Once the audience arrives at the stage show, there will be a pre-selection process to discover those who will end up on stage. This usually involves suggestibility tests and the purpose of these tests is not to find the most easily hypnotised subjects, but to find the exhibitionists.

One example of these types of tests is the hand clasp test, where members of the audience are instructed to hold their arms straight out in front of them at shoulder height and to interlink their fingers and press their palms together. Suggestions are then made that at a given cue they will be unable to pull their hands apart. Suggestions are then given to return all suggestions to normal. Suggestions are then made that at a given cue they will be able to pull the hands apart. Suggestions are then given returning all sensations to normal. Once this has been done, the audience watchers, who are placed around the auditorium, will pick out the people who draw attention to themselves by indicating that they could open their hands and therefore were not hypnotised. These people will often raise their hands up in the air to draw more attention to this fact. These people are usually then selected to come up on stage.

In other situations, audience members who are ordinarily not exhibitionists but who found that their hands were stuck together are very good at being given suggestions and so these people who ordinarily wouldn't step out into the limelight can then be encouraged to become participants in the show too. Once up on stage, the hypnotist encourages the people there by directing the applause of the audience to the person being hypnotised, and by directing them to more and more outrageous behaviour.

The final component in the show will be the abrogation of responsibility, whereby a person on stage can do all manner of things while claiming the stage hypnotist made them do it. Some stage hypnotists encourage their audience participants to more outrageous behaviour by telling them that the more they do, the more intelligent or good fun they are, so they work on the ego of their subject. When the person comes offstage, they can tell their friends that they don't remember what they've done or they were under the influence of the stage hypnotist, so there can be no blame attached to their behaviour.

Frequently the participants in a stage show will be given some free tickets to a future performance. In the meantime, those who went to the show will tell those to whom they gave the tickets all that happened, and the stories will become progressively more outrageous. By the time the next group goes to the show they already heavily primed for the event and the exhibitionist of the new group will want to outdo the first performance and so it goes on.

A hypnotised person would not necessarily be a very good performer in a stage show as when a person is deeply in hypnosis, they hardly move, and any response shown would be slow and small. Patients asking about stage hypnosis can therefore be assured that during clinical hypnosis, they will become relaxed and quite still and will only do what they feel comfortable to do and will remain in control throughout.

There are instances when people who participate in stage hypnosis shows are genuinely in an altered state rather than one that was induced by alcohol. This could happen if the participant is a somnambulist or is vulnerable to suggestions as a result of a pre-existing condition or sequence of events, or because they want to believe themselves to be hypnotised and they begin to enter hypnotic state as a result of this belief.

Following the sudden death of her daughter Sharon Tabarn after she had participated in a stage hypnosis show, Margaret Harper formed the Campaign Against Stage Hypnosis. Known as C.A.S.H., the aim of this organisation was to get stage hypnosis banned in the UK.

People who ask about stage hypnosis usually want reassurance that they will be safe and in control. And so, the key difference between the two is that in stage hypnosis, when a person volunteers to be a part of the show, they are effectively handing control over to the hypnotist for the duration of the show. In the clinical hypnosis session, it's more the partnership where the therapist and the patient would agree upon a goal and then the suggestions and the therapeutic process will be fully explained and the patient will be reassured that at all times, they are the one in control throughout the entire session.